diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'pkgs/development/tools/misc/gnum4/no-gets.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | pkgs/development/tools/misc/gnum4/no-gets.patch | 26 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/pkgs/development/tools/misc/gnum4/no-gets.patch b/pkgs/development/tools/misc/gnum4/no-gets.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 456c08b56c3..00000000000 --- a/pkgs/development/tools/misc/gnum4/no-gets.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,26 +0,0 @@ -http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-devel/m4/files/m4-1.4.16-no-gets.patch?revision=1.1 - -https://bugs.gentoo.org/424978 - -hack until m4 pulls a newer gnulib version - -From 66712c23388e93e5c518ebc8515140fa0c807348 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> -Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:30:41 -0600 -Subject: [PATCH] stdio: don't assume gets any more - -Gnulib intentionally does not have a gets module, and now that C11 -and glibc have dropped it, we should be more proactive about warning -any user on a platform that still has a declaration of this dangerous -interface. - ---- a/lib/stdio.in.h -+++ b/lib/stdio.in.h -@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ - so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is - always declared, since it is required by C89. */ - #undef gets --_GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead"); - - #if @GNULIB_FOPEN@ - # if @REPLACE_FOPEN@ |