summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/pkgs/development/compilers/gcc/common/libgcc.nix
blob: 29ec421555ed0506e7f8a28432c337f059602702 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
{ lib
, stdenv
, version
, langC
, langCC
, langJit
, targetPlatform
, hostPlatform
, crossStageStatic
, enableShared
}:

assert !stdenv.targetPlatform.hasSharedLibraries -> !enableShared;

drv: lib.pipe drv

([

  (pkg: pkg.overrideAttrs (previousAttrs:
    lib.optionalAttrs (
      targetPlatform != hostPlatform &&
      targetPlatform.libc == "msvcrt" &&
      crossStageStatic
    ) {
      makeFlags = [ "all-gcc" "all-target-libgcc" ];
      installTargets = "install-gcc install-target-libgcc";
    }))

] ++

# nixpkgs did not add the "libgcc" output until gcc11.  In theory
# the following condition can be changed to `true`, but that has not
# been tested.
lib.optional (lib.versionAtLeast version "11.0")

(let
  enableLibGccOutput =
    (with stdenv; targetPlatform == hostPlatform) &&
    !langJit &&
    !stdenv.hostPlatform.isDarwin &&
    !stdenv.hostPlatform.isStatic
    ;

in
(pkg: pkg.overrideAttrs (previousAttrs: lib.optionalAttrs ((!langC) || langJit || enableLibGccOutput) {
  outputs = previousAttrs.outputs ++ lib.optionals enableLibGccOutput [ "libgcc" ];
  # This is a separate phase because gcc assembles its phase scripts
  # in bash instead of nix (we should fix that).
  preFixupPhases = (previousAttrs.preFixupPhases or []) ++ lib.optionals ((!langC) || enableLibGccOutput) [ "preFixupLibGccPhase" ];
  preFixupLibGccPhase =
    # delete extra/unused builds of libgcc_s in non-langC builds
    # (i.e. libgccjit, gnat, etc) to avoid potential confusion
    lib.optionalString (!langC) ''
      rm -f $out/lib/libgcc_s.so*
    ''

    # TODO(amjoseph): remove the `libgcc_s.so` symlinks below and replace them
    # with a `-L${gccForLibs.libgcc}/lib` in cc-wrapper's
    # `$out/nix-support/cc-flags`.  See also:
    # - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/209870#discussion_r1130614895
    # - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/209870#discussion_r1130635982
    # - https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/404155c6acfa59456aebe6156b22fe385e7dec6f
    #
    # move `libgcc_s.so` into its own output, `$libgcc`
    + lib.optionalString enableLibGccOutput (''
      # move libgcc from lib to its own output (libgcc)
      mkdir -p $libgcc/lib
      mv    $lib/lib/libgcc_s.so      $libgcc/lib/
      mv    $lib/lib/libgcc_s.so.1    $libgcc/lib/
      ln -s $libgcc/lib/libgcc_s.so   $lib/lib/
      ln -s $libgcc/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 $lib/lib/
    ''
    #
    # Nixpkgs ordinarily turns dynamic linking into pseudo-static linking:
    # libraries are still loaded dynamically, exactly which copy of each
    # library is loaded is permanently fixed at compile time (via RUNPATH).
    # For libgcc_s we must revert to the "impure dynamic linking" style found
    # in imperative software distributions.  We must do this because
    # `libgcc_s` calls `malloc()` and therefore has a `DT_NEEDED` for `libc`,
    # which creates two problems:
    #
    #  1. A circular package dependency `glibc`<-`libgcc`<-`glibc`
    #
    #  2. According to the `-Wl,-rpath` flags added by Nixpkgs' `ld-wrapper`,
    #     the two versions of `glibc` in the cycle above are actually
    #     different packages.  The later one is compiled by this `gcc`, but
    #     the earlier one was compiled by the compiler *that compiled* this
    #     `gcc` (usually the bootstrapFiles).  In any event, the `glibc`
    #     dynamic loader won't honor that specificity without namespaced
    #     manual loads (`dlmopen()`).  Once a `libc` is present in the address
    #     space of a process, that `libc` will be used to satisfy all
    #     `DT_NEEDED`s for `libc`, regardless of `RUNPATH`s.
    #
    # So we wipe the RUNPATH using `patchelf --set-rpath ""`.  We can't use
    # `patchelf --remove-rpath`, because at least as of patchelf 0.15.0 it
    # will leave the old RUNPATH string in the file where the reference
    # scanner can still find it:
    #
    #   https://github.com/NixOS/patchelf/issues/453
    #
    # Note: we might be using the bootstrapFiles' copy of patchelf, so we have
    # to keep doing it this way until both the issue is fixed *and* all the
    # bootstrapFiles are regenerated, on every platform.
    #
    # This patchelfing is *not* effectively equivalent to copying
    # `libgcc_s` into `glibc`'s outpath.  There is one minor and one
    # major difference:
    #
    # 1. (Minor): multiple builds of `glibc` (say, with different
    #    overrides or parameters) will all reference a single store
    #    path:
    #
    #      /nix/store/xxx...xxx-gcc-libgcc/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
    #
    #    This many-to-one referrer relationship will be visible in the store's
    #    dependency graph, and will be available to `nix-store -q` queries.
    #    Copying `libgcc_s` into each of its referrers would lose that
    #    information.
    #
    # 2. (Major): by referencing `libgcc_s.so.1`, rather than copying it, we
    #    are still able to run `nix-store -qd` on it to find out how it got
    #    built!  Most importantly, we can see from that deriver which compiler
    #    was used to build it (or if it is part of the unpacked
    #    bootstrap-files).  Copying `libgcc_s.so.1` from one outpath to
    #    another eliminates the ability to make these queries.
    #
    + ''
      patchelf --set-rpath "" $libgcc/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
    '');
}))))