On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 12:35:47PM +0300, Ville Ilvonen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:11 PM Alyssa Ross wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 02:02:15PM +0300, Ville Ilvonen wrote: > > > * ADRs based on discussions with Alyssa > > > * A note on ADRs to architecture.adoc > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Ilvonen > > > > Hi Ville, thanks for taking the lead on these. > > > > I've been wondering whether it would be better to only take accepted > > ADRs into the Spectrum repository, and leave proposed ones for > > discussion on the list until they're ready to be accepted. I think that > > would make the distinction between them clearer. What do you think? > > I was thinking separation by status when writing the PR. > Maybe restructuring to folders like > Documentation/adr/accepted > Documentation/adr/proposed > ... > would make sense? I've thought about this a bit more, and decided that it's fine to have proposed ADRs in the repo. I was concerned about the in-between state an ADR could find itself in when it's been submitted but I haven't applied the patch yet, but having thought about it more, I don't think having a stage of "being accepted for discussion" is a bad thing.