summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/.github
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* CODEOWNERS: Make @orivej a {cc,bintools}-wrapper codeownerJohn Ericson2018-01-19
|
* CODEOWNERS cleanupEelco Dolstra2018-01-19
| | | | I haven't worked on stdenv etc. in a long time.
* CODEOWNERS: Add me, @Ericson2314, to a few thingsJohn Ericson2017-12-18
|
* CODEOWNERS: Add ttuegel for Qt / KDEThomas Tuegel2017-12-07
|
* CODEOWNERS: exclude lib/licenses.nixYegor Timoshenko2017-11-16
|
* Merge pull request #31534 from yegortimoshenko/patch-7Orivej Desh2017-11-16
|\ | | | | CODEOWNERS: exclude lib/maintainers.nix
| * CODEOWNERS: exclude lib/maintainers.nixYegor Timoshenko2017-11-11
| | | | | | Resolves #31401.
* | ISSUE_TEMPLATE: replace technical details withh nix-infoGraham Christensen2017-11-13
| |
* | CONTRIBUTING.md: be more precise what is meant by formatting commitsJoerg Thalheim2017-11-13
|/
* CODEOWNERS: fix path notationzimbatm2017-11-01
| | | | | | | | | | This format uses the path matching algorithm as the .gitignore format. The paths need to be prefixed with a / to become absolute, otherwise it will match all of these files. The paths will also match any of the sub-paths by default so it's not necessary to use the `*` like in bash globbing.
* Flag my-self as owner of Nixpkgs and NixOS internalsNicolas B. Pierron2017-11-01
|
* CODEOWNERS: fix path matchingzimbatm2017-10-30
|
* CODEOWNERS: add zimbatm to ruby moduleszimbatm2017-10-30
|
* Merge pull request #29668 from vyp/doc/contributing.mdJoachim F2017-10-28
|\ | | | | CONTRIBUTING.md: mention that the meta.license and meta.maintainers attributes must be set
| * CONTRIBUTING.md: license should default to unfree if there is noxd1le2017-10-09
| | | | | | | | upstream license
| * CONTRIBUTING.md: mention that the meta.license and meta.maintainersxd1le2017-09-22
| | | | | | | | attributes must be set
* | Update CODEOWNERS to use darwin-maintainers teamMatthew Justin Bauer2017-10-12
| | | | | | | | | | This sets up the Darwin-maintainers team as CODEOWNERS for Darwin paths. So anyone in that team will get notified (instead of just listing individuals). /cc @org/darwin-maintainers
* | pr template: make values of platform field less ambiguousMaxime Dénès2017-10-09
| |
* | CODEOWNERS: add @rycee for Eclipse IDERobert Helgesson2017-10-05
| |
* | CODEOWNERS: jetbrainsEdward Tjörnhammar2017-09-19
|/
* Remove Profpatsch from the CODEOWNERS fileProfpatsch2017-09-13
| | | | | Since CODEOWNERS shall be interpreted as actual ownership (and not just a mentionbot replacement), I will remove myself again.
* Add gleber to CODEOWNERs of beam-related packages.Gleb Peregud2017-09-11
|
* Set ownership of CODEOWNERSEelco Dolstra2017-09-07
|
* Change owner of stdenv and libEelco Dolstra2017-09-07
|
* CODEOWNERS: (align-regexp "@") my code blocksPeter Simons2017-09-07
|
* CODEOWNERS: tabs are evilPeter Simons2017-09-07
|
* CODEOWNERS: add peti for R-related codePeter Simons2017-09-07
|
* CODEOWNERS: add peti for Haskell-related codePeter Simons2017-09-07
|
* CODEOWNERS: add Profpatsch to various pathsProfpatsch2017-09-07
|
* pr template: make formatting consistentPiotr Bogdan2017-09-03
|
* documentation: use modern Firefox version in exampleDmitry Kalinkin2017-09-01
|
* Pull request template: comment out instructionsLinus Heckemann2017-08-12
|
* Add myself to CODEOWNERS, and use tab consistentlyJohn Ericson2017-07-31
|
* Merge pull request #27499 from FRidh/codeownersFrederik Rietdijk2017-07-30
|\ | | | | CODEOWNERS file for review requests
| * CODEOWNERS file for review requestsFrederik Rietdijk2017-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some time ago GitHub introduced the CODEOWNERS file. The file is similar to the MAINTAINERS file that was proposed in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/13602. Code owners will automatically receive a review request.
* | PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: mereley -> merelyYegor Timoshenko2017-07-28
|/
* Pull request template: clarify the purpose of the templateFrederik Rietdijk2017-07-22
|
* CONTRIBUTING.md: suggest "nixos/<module>" prefix for NixOS changesBjørn Forsman2017-07-22
| | | | | | | | | Suggest prefixing commit messages that touches NixOS code with "nixos/<module>" instead of the current "<name> service" prefix. "<name> service" is limiting in that NixOS code is more than the services. It is also easier to spot NixOS changes with explicit "nixos/..." prefix.
* github/pr-template: Add note about NixOS testsaszlig2017-06-23
| | | | | | | | | | | On several occasions I've seen people bumping packages which have NixOS tests but without actually running them. While this probably won't prevent such occasions entirely, at least it serves as an additional checklist item so contributors don't forget about these tests. Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
* github issue template: add sandboxing infoAlexey Shmalko2017-05-01
|
* CONTRIBUTING.md: improve commit message guidelinesHannu Hartikainen2017-02-06
| | | | | Add a brief request for expressing the motivation for a change. Change the example commit messages to match. Resolves #19126.
* CONTRIBUTING.md: switch to a link that actually worksVladimír Čunát2016-11-24
| | | | Fixes #20594.
* Update PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdIgnat Loskutov2016-11-04
| | | Follow the rebranding of OS X into macOS
* Merge pull request #18972 from ericsagnes/doc/reviewing-contributionszimbatm2016-10-01
|\ | | | | [WIP] nixos-doc: add reviewing contributions chapter
| * improvements from feedbackEric Sagnes2016-09-28
| |
| * nixos-doc: add reviewing-contributionsEric Sagnes2016-09-26
| |
* | Update broken link in CONTRIBUTING.mdWink Saville2016-09-23
|/ | | | The current link returns a 404 error
* PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: rename chroot to sandboxRushmore Mushambi2016-09-02
| | | See https://github.com/NixOS/nix/commit/b39622a487e2978bd32c9faf2f651aec1f9815c1
* PR template: go back to old option name for nowVladimír Čunát2016-06-29
| | | | | The old one works on all nix(os) versions, whereas the new one doesn't work e.g. on default 16.03 setting. Discussed on #15112.
* Update PR template with motivation for changesDaniel Peebles2016-05-24
| | | I'm seeing a lot of PRs that only include the checklist, when the main thing I care about when I'm reviewing a PR is what the author was thinking when they decided to make the change.