diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | pkgs/tools/system/acct/default.nix | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | pkgs/tools/system/acct/no-gets.patch | 22 |
2 files changed, 24 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pkgs/tools/system/acct/default.nix b/pkgs/tools/system/acct/default.nix index 003dbb45a2a..a2ea6176c74 100644 --- a/pkgs/tools/system/acct/default.nix +++ b/pkgs/tools/system/acct/default.nix @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ stdenv.mkDerivation rec { sha256 = "1mbg18acrva5m7kxc9pzhaknsqm4r90nrp7ax9jkm9wjkrxwhqs1"; }; + patches = [ ./no-gets.patch ]; + doCheck = true; meta = { diff --git a/pkgs/tools/system/acct/no-gets.patch b/pkgs/tools/system/acct/no-gets.patch new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3478b66de9d --- /dev/null +++ b/pkgs/tools/system/acct/no-gets.patch @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +hack until acct pulls a newer gnulib version + +From 66712c23388e93e5c518ebc8515140fa0c807348 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> +Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 13:30:41 -0600 +Subject: [PATCH] stdio: don't assume gets any more + +Gnulib intentionally does not have a gets module, and now that C11 +and glibc have dropped it, we should be more proactive about warning +any user on a platform that still has a declaration of this dangerous +interface. + +--- a/lib/stdio.in.h ++++ b/lib/stdio.in.h +@@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ + so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is + always declared, since it is required by C89. */ + #undef gets +-_GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead"); + + #if @GNULIB_FOPEN@ + # if @REPLACE_FOPEN@ |