Replace hasAttr/getAttr calls with the ? and . operators

For NixOS evaluation, this gives a ~21% reduction in the number of
values allocated and a ~4% speedup. It's also more readable.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/lib/strings-with-deps.nix b/lib/strings-with-deps.nix
index 3ad3e599150..bdcc25cbd20 100644
--- a/lib/strings-with-deps.nix
+++ b/lib/strings-with-deps.nix
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ rec {
             in { result = x.result ++ [entry.text] ++ y.result;
                  done = y.done;
                }
-          else if hasAttr entry done then f done (tail todo)
-          else f (done // listToAttrs [{name = entry; value = 1;}]) ([(builtins.getAttr entry predefined)] ++ tail todo);
+          else if done ? ${entry} then f done (tail todo)
+          else f (done // listToAttrs [{name = entry; value = 1;}]) ([predefined.${entry}] ++ tail todo);
     in (f {} arg).result;
 
   textClosureMap = f: predefined: names: